A Few Things To Note About The Election

I had no clear preference in the election. I didn’t like either major party candidate. And the Libertarian Party chose the worst possible candidates. The presidential candidate, apart from not knowing what Aleppo is, failed to endorse the freedom of association principle by arguing that bakers should be forced to bake gay wedding cakes. And his vice presidential candidate couldn’t give a straight answer as to whether you should vote for his ticket or Hillary Clinton’s. I have voted in all Swedish elections since I became 18 but I’m not sure I would have voted if I had been an American citizen.

What Trump’s win will mean remains to be seen. His trade policy is really horrible, but much of his other  proposed policies are good, including his foreign policy, income- and corporate tax cuts, opposition to many destructive regulations and his pledge to appoint Supreme Court judges that won’t try to legislate from the bench.

Anyway, Here you can find the full results of the election. Some noteable things:

-Despite having worst ticket ever, the Libertarian Party candidates Gary Johnson & Bill Weld got the strongest result ever, 3.2% of the vote.They weren’t on the ballot in some states, but got 6.3% in North Dakota and 5.9% in Alaska.

-Washington DC  had the by far biggest Hillary majority 93-4. Other strongholds include Hawaii, Vermont, California and New York (which BTW is the home state of both Hillary and Trump) .

-The biggest Trump majority was in Wyoming, where he won by 70-22.5.He also won landslide victories in a few other states like West Virginia, Oklahoma and North Dakota.West Virginia is the most remarkable because Hillary Clinton’s husband won it back in the 1990’s. Yet now, she just got 26.5% compared to 68.7% for Trump.

-Trump actually did better among blacks and hispanics than Romney 2012 according to exit polls.


The Chewbacca Defense Election

The current american presidential election is really a disgrace. It seems to have come down to whether Bill Clinton or Donald Trump is the greatest sexist.

The sexual comments and even alleged behavior of Donald Trump, or for that matter Bill Clinton, are really irrelevant for this election, just as their preferences when it comes to movies or favorite colors are.

What is relevant is what their policies are. I don’t give a rat’s ass about their private lives as that doesn’t affect us. So I really think the race should return to discussing the issues. Unfortunately though, the media establishment seems determined to distract us from that.

So this seems to be a “Chewbacca defense election”. For those who don’t know, “Chewbacca defense” is when you bring up irrelevant issues to distract from the relevant ones in winning a contest. In its original form, in “South Park”, “Jonnie Chochran” brought up the issue why Chewbacca, an 8 foot tall wookie from Kashyyk would want to live on Endor with a bunch of 2 foot tall Ewoks, in a trial regarding the intellectual property rights of a musical composite.


Remembering 9/11

One of the days in my life that I remember the clearest was September 11, 2001. It happened 15 years ago, but I can remember it(or at least the parts that followed after the terror attacks) as clearly as if it happened yesterday.

I was about to go to the bus station and take the bus to my hometown to attend my paternal grandmother’s funeral in the following day. I checked the Internet to see if there was anything new and I saw that a plane had crashed into one of the twin towers of the World Trade Center. An accident it was said, and that’s what I thought too and looked at the time and realized I had to go immediately. But when I came to the bus, the bus driver had turned on the radio so loud so all passengers could hear. I then found out that the second tower had also been hit, as well as the Pentagon. Then it was obvious that it wasn’t an accident, it was a terrorist attack. Through the entire 1½ to 2 hour bus trip I listened to the horrifying radio reporting. It left me horrified, depressed and angry that such evil people could exist.

The fact that I have actually been on the top of one of those towers also made it creepy.

I was somewhat comforted later however by the forceful comments by President Bush wowing to destroy those who were behind the attacks, and when he visited the WTC sites, he said to the people there “I can hear you, and the people who knocked these buildings down will hear all of us soon”.

Unfortunately Bush completely messed up the response. He should have devoted more military resources to Afghanistan, including not only more air strikes, but also more ground troops to defeat the Taliban and al-Qaeda in Afghanistan (and the lawless taliban regions of Pakistan that borders to Afghanistan). Instead he focused all his attention on Iraq, whose dictator Saddam Hussein certainly was vile, but posed no threat to us and had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks.

Instead he helped establish al-Qaeda in Iraq, though the so-called “surge” helped significantly weaken it, almost destroying it,but only almost. And because of Obama’s premature departure and the so-called “Arab spring” that most Western pundits celebrated, the remnants of al-Qaeda in Iraq grew strong again and became “the Islamic State” (or ISIS, ISIL or Daesh) and also took over parts of Syria.

I’m not sure how this mess is to be cleaned up. Except that we should focus on jihadists to a greater extent than before, instead of secular Arab dictators.












What’s Behind Record Low Bond Yields?

Currently, yields on government bonds are at record low levels.It is telling that the current U.S. 10-year yield of about 1.5% is acually considered high.

In some countries, like Japan, Switzerland and Germany, the 10-year yield is actually negative even in nominal terms. And despite having higher inflation than these countries, Sweden’s 10-year yield is currently only a few basis points from zero in nominal terms. Inflation protected bonds are at about -1.5%. And if you look at government securities of shorter maturities yields are even lower. So what’s going on here?

Well, there are three possible explanations:
1) A “glut of savings”
2) Monetary expansion
3) Excess risk aversion from investors

Most likely, all three of these factors play a role. China, and other East Asian nations, have a large surplus of savings that they “export”. And as the European debt crisis have made countries tighten their belts and borrow less, creating a surplus of savings.

Meanwhile, as the drop in the prices of oil and other commodities have pushed down consumer price inflation, central banks, doubling down on their inflation-target ideology have pursued increasingly inflationary policies. The problem is that these policies have had much greater effect on the prices of assets. like bonds, than on consumer prices.

Still, it appears that these factors can’t alone explain the drop in bond yields. If they did, then stock prices would have been a lot higher than now. Valuations are above the historical average, but the implicit yield (the reversed p/e ratio), as well as the dividend yield, is relative to bond yields far higher than ever before, implying risk aversion from investors.

Venezuela & Texas

As you might have heard, Venezuela is facing economic collapse. Leftists, many of whom previously praised it as a role model tries to blame it on the sharp drop in oil prices.

Since Venezuela’s economy depend greatly on revenues from oil exports, it is no doubt the case that the price drop has weakened its economy, compared to how it would have been if oil stayed expensive. However, the point is that current weakness isn’t because of cheap oil, it’s that it wasn’t weak before only because oil was expensive.

Venezuela after all, isn’t the only country/region/state that is highly dependent on  revenues from oil exports. Yet you don’t see the hyperinflation and shortages that Venezuela suffers from in for example Saudi Arabia, Norway or Russia. And in Texas,the state whose oil industry, gained international fame in the 1980s through the TV series “Dallas”, not only aren’t wee seeing any shortages or hyperinflation, employment is up 1.6% in the latest year, not very different from the national average.



Brexit Would Be Good For Britain, Bad For The Rest

In little over two weeks, the people of Britain will vote on whether or not to stay in the EU or not. What’s to make of that? Well, in short, it would be good for Britain, but bad for the rest of us if they decided to leave.

There have been some anti-exit doomssayers “reports” claiming that Brexit would have devastating effects on the British economy. But while the initial uncertainty about the terms of future trade agreements could indeed initially have a negative effect, there is no reason to believe there will be a permanent negative effect. Britain is too important (the biggest export market) for the rest of the EU to start a trade war or anything like that.

Meanwhile, Britain would save all the money they now send to Brussells, and would be free of much of the Brussells regulations and could have even freer trade with the rest of the world.

So, Brexit would be good for the Britons (at least to the extent we overlook the indirect negative effects of what I’m going to write in the next sentence) . Unfortunately it would be bad for those of us who live in the rest of the EU. Britain is the most important voice for global free trade and against EU regulations, and so if they leave, the EU would become more statist.

So, despite the benefits of Brexit for the people of Britain, I hope the “remain”-camp wins

America Has Long Repudiated It’s Debt

Donald Trump has now suggested that America should “renegotiate” its national debt, similar to what has been done in Argentina, Greece and other low or middle income states.

That has upsetted some writers because it would jeopardize the status of U.S. Treasuries as “risk-free investments”. In a way they have a point as the higher borrowing cost this would mean would most likely outweigh any gains from debt writedown for the U.S. government, so Trump’s suggestion would be as he would put it, “a terrible deal”. While Trump may be a good businessman, he sure doesn’t understand economics.

One much smarter way to in effect repudiate its national debt is to use the old fashioned method of pursuing more inflationary policies by the Fed. That way the debt burden will decline even as Treasuries remain formally “risk free”. Because of money illusion and accounting rules, de facto debt writedowns through inflation are feared much less by investors than formal debt writedowns and would mean much lower borrowing costs for the U.S. government.